Sunday, January 1, 2012

Happy New Year!


Real

I am feeling real today
And I'm not sure why
It doesn't seem to be my schedule
Nor the color of the sky.

Today I have that feeling
Proud, but relieved still more
Yesterday I accomplished
What I was scared to do before.

I think I have an idea
The reason, it may be,
I have got my addiction
But no more does it have me.

(Adapted from a poem
by Alicia A. Gibson © 2003)


Sunday, December 25, 2011

Don't Let the Holidays Get You Down


The holidays can be a train wreck for people in recovery. "Recovery from what?" you ask.

Recovery from alcoholism or drugs or incest or divorce or any of life's destructive happenings. Whether they were your fault or not, they left their mark.

People are fragile. People get hurt. 

The holidays can magnify past hurts and failures exponentially.  

Here is a little story (true) of hope.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Children With High IQ More Likely To Subsequently Use Illegal Drugs





 According to a study published online in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, a high IQ in childhood could be associated to illegal drug use later in life, especially among women. The researchers findings were based on data from just under 8,000 individuals in the 1970 British Cohort Study, a large ongoing population based investigation, which examines educational attainment, lifetime drug use as well as socioeconomic factors.

Researchers used a validated scale in order to measure the IQ scores of participants at the ages of 5 and ten years. In addition they collected information on participants self reported levels of drug use and psychological distress at the age of 16 and again at the age of 30 (drug use only).

Drug use included cocaine, cannabis, LSD (acid), heroin, downers (tanks, blues, barbiturates), and uppers (speed and wiz).

They discovered that 1 in 3 men (35.4%) and 1 in 6 women (15.9%) had used cannabis by the age of 30. Furthermore, they found that in the previous 12 months 3.6% of women and 8.6% of men had used cocaine.

For other drugs they discovered a similar pattern of use, with overall drug use two times as prevalent in men as among women participants.

When intelligence was taken into account, the examination revealed that men who received high IQ scores when they were 5 years old were approximately 50% more likely to have taken ecstasy, several illegal drugs, and amphetamines 25 years later compared to men who received low IQ scores.

Women with a high IQ score were more than two times as likely to have used cocaine and cannabis later in life compared to those with low IQ scores.

They discovered that the same associations appeared between participants who received a high IQ score at the age of 10 and subsequent use of ecstasy, cannabis, multiple drug use and cocaine, even though this last connection was only apparent at age 30.

The discoveries held true, regardless of parental social class, lifetime household income and anxiety/depression during adolescence.

The researchers explain:

"Although most studies have suggested that higher child or adolescent IQ prompts the adoption of a healthy lifestyle as an adult, other studies have linked higher childhood IQ scores to excess alcohol intake and alcohol dependency in adulthood."


Even though it is not exactly clear why there should be an association between illegal drug use and high IQ, the researchers highlight that prior investigations have revealed that individuals who are highly intelligent are open to experiences and keen on stimulation and novelty.

In addition other studies have shown that children who are intelligent are usually easily bored and suffer at the hands of their peers for being different, "either of which could conceivably increase vulnerability to using drugs as an avoidant coping strategy," say the researchers.

Written by Grace Rattue


Tuesday, November 29, 2011

"Unloading" the State Burden on the Counties -- A Very Bad Idea

Here is an October 7, 2011 article from Tonya Page of the Family Bail Blog:

California Inmates Transferred to County Jails

The LAPD and the LA Sheriff’s Department are suddenly finding themselves a bit more stretched. Mandated under the Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, each of California’s 58 counties, including Los Angeles, will need to take responsibility of certain current and future state prisoners within their jurisdiction. The Act, also known as AB109, went into effect on Oct. 1.

Under the direction of the Act, non-serious, non-violent and non-sex offenders (known as “non-non-non”) will now serve out their sentences in county jails instead of in state prisons.

Los Angeles Impact

LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles Police Department Chief Charlie Beck, and other city officials point to increased expenses to the city, including the need to hire additional officers. Additional gang intervention and prevention personnel will also need to be trained, points out Los Angeles gang expert Connie Rice.

Response times for 911 services may also increase, Beck said.

For the average citizen, the question may be “why?”.

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) suggests that approximately 7,000 inmates currently sentenced to serve time in state prisons will now be housed within the Los Angels County Jail System.

According to an Aug. 2011 report prepared by the County of Los Angeles Community Corrections Partnership (CCP), the CRCR also projects that “approximately 9,000 offenders will be released to the Los Angeles Postrelease Community Supervision (PCS) in FY2011-12. By the end of year two, between 14,000 and 15,000 individuals are expected to be under PCS in Los Angeles County”. It’s further projected that 44 percent of the PCS population will be comprised of drug offenders, 41 percent will have been convicted of property offenses, 14 percent convicted of “other”.

LA County Chief Probation Officer Donald. H. Blevins has emphasized that “the Act is limited to serving non-violent, non-serious non-sex offenders after they are released from state prison to be supervised at the county level,” Blevins said in an earlier statement. ”This is the offender that my operation will be supervising.”